Entertainment value:

(I really shouldn't, and I do TRY to ignore it, but sometimes...)

peterwolf wrote:while being legally enforecable are NOT Law

There may be a semantic difference, but so fucking what? "THE LAW" is a mixture of statute, precedent and common practice. If 'The Man' imposes a tax/fine/charge on you, and if they have the will and the means (financial or physical) to enforce it, then we pay up. That's the nature of power. Technically, there are all kinds of minor fees and charges that we get away with because nobody bothers to enforce them, or it's uneconomical to do so.Copyright is an example where the will may be there, but current technology means the illegal downloader can generally get away with it. Parking tickets and road tax on the other hand are necessary and enforceable, so picking apart
the semantics is beyond futile.

peterwolf wrote:Ask the Revenue Collection Officer under what authority and under what LAW they are acting and they wont be able to answer

..or even give a shit - what, are you expecting some guy in some call centre to say "Curses! Foiled by your legal logic - you do not have to pay Road Tax because I cannot answer your fiendish question!"?

peterwolf wrote:If you are arrested you want to know if you are being arrested for breaking a LAW and not a statute


No, I just want to know what it will cost me, can I get away with it and am I going to get a kicking.

peterwolf wrote:If this happens to you then ask them the above question and if they fail to answer it correctly or dont answer it then remind them that failure to DIFFERENTIATE between what is a LAW and what is a STATUTE is GROSS NEGLIGENCE/An abuse of power and is in fact equivalent to Common Law FRAUD and FRAUD is a CRIMINAL act under COMMON LAW [The Law of the land] and is a punishable offence

Oh Jesus, you're lapsing into sporadic CAPITALS now, so take a deep breath and have a lie down. (Every time I see a word in angry capitals in a political post, it' like frothing spittle hitting the keyboard. And as I've mentioned before, typing FACT in capitals at the end is the internet equivalent of writing letters in green ink. It's as self-defeating as the phrase "trust me", in that it instantly flags up what you saying as potential bullshit.

And finally, you don't like conservatism, you don't like socialism and you don't like anarchy. Since you style yourself as a free-thinker who refuses to be bound by any consensus or movement (for which I read a disaffected lackwit without the brains or balls to stand behind any particular principal or formulate a positive political viewpoint), I guess the only state of affairs that could possibly satisfy you is the Glorious Dictatorship of Peterwolf. Seig Heil!

*********************************************************************************



"Oh Jesus, you're lapsing into sporadic CAPITALS now, so take a deep breath and have a lie down. (Every time I see a word in angry capitals in a political post, it' like frothing spittle hitting the keyboard. And as I've mentioned before, typing FACT in capitals at the end is the internet equivalent of writing letters in green ink. It's as self-defeating as the phrase "trust me", in that it instantly flags up what you saying as potential bullshit.

And finally, you don't like conservatism, you don't like socialism and you don't like anarchy. Since you style yourself as a free-thinker who refuses to be bound by any consensus or movement (for which I read a disaffected lackwit without the brains or balls to stand behind any particular principal or formulate a positive political viewpoint), I guess the only state of affairs that could possibly satisfy you is the Glorious Dictatorship of Peterwolf. Seig Heil!"

I do try to ignore it i really do but SOMETIMES ........

Oh Jesus , I am using capitals to emphasise points.Dont assume its anger because it isnt.The posts are points of interest that were the core of a lecture given by John Harris to the British Constitution Group back in January and are the result of 2 yrs of research on the part of various individuals who put the work in studying it.

You assume a lot of things dont you ? [re:the 2nd paragraph of your post cut and pasted here] which are not worthy of comment on my part and i am going to resist the temptation to insult you back in return [you should think yourself lucky in that respect] other than to say that you dont understand what i am saying or what the Fuck you are talking about.

Quite honestly you have sunk *so* far down in my estimation that i really have no further comment for you now or at any time in the future.I have nothing but contempt for you.

You cant even differentiate between Politics and Constitution :lol: then you assume to understand my political beliefs and to add further insult you then assume i am a Nazi [and even name] after insulting my intelligence.You wouldnt last 5 minutes in a political debate.

Unbelievable and pathetic but not surprising unfortunately.Not in the least.

Thanks for finally confirming what i have suspected for some time.

Stupid beyond words.


************

Notice how the Liberal [from what i can gather] resorts to a stock Liberal /lefty insult.That being "Nazi".The other two that are widely used are "Racist" or "Extremist".This is not to mention the lesser insults that were also being used.

I explain about what is lawful and what isnt - "So fucking what.." is the reply that i get.

I explain about what a Statute is and i get stupid sarcasm.Still what more can you expect ?

Later on he recants "And i wasnt calling you a Nazi" !.



"And I wasn't calling you a Nazi, I was pointing out that since you seem to disagree with every political standpoint going, but don't like the idea of anarchy, what system would you proprose other than a benign dictatorship run by yourself? In other words, we know what you're against, but what are you for?"


Which category do i belong in ?

He fails to understand what i am saying.

No wonder this country is Fucked with a capital F.

Not to mention an earlier comment posted some time ago where this individual said that when he get his Communist revolution "I will be first against the wall..."



Enough said really.


There is so much wrong in those comments i just dont know where to start.

Comment of the year so far...