David Cameron:

Yes what a cute adorable little puppy but what about all of the dead and maimed children and civilians and all the rest of it that you are partly responsible for ??

What say you about that ???

How can you go home at night to your own family and play with your children and read them bedtime stories when children in Libya are being bombed with DU munitions that you authorised ??

Have you ever watched any of the video footage of it uploaded online ???

I strongly suggest that you do watch the videos.

[I will warn others not to watch any of the footage if they are of a sensitive nature and are not prepared for what you will see as once you have watched the footage you will not forget it and you will be affected by it like i was although i was prepared for it and i have seen similar footage plenty of times before]

History will bear this out by the time that your children have reached adulthood and then they might stop and ask you why ?? presuming that your children dont become what you are now.

Anyway nice puppy........

I am sick of this fake Tory prick traitor already and i cant stand his archetypal Eton public schoolboy looks and mannerisms and speech.Fucking silver spoon fake tory child and baby killer.

Alex Jones/Infowars/Prison Planet irregularity :

Why wont these websites ever discuss and promote what is known as Lawful Rebellion/Freeman Of The Land and why wont they cover the fact that the US and the UK and the EU are corporate entities ??

Why is this ???

I have my suspicions and i have called them out directly over this irregularity on the website but i get no response whatsoever.I will in time send AJ an email regarding this but no doubt i will be ignored and i will be ignored because the subject is strictly off limits as a policy so therefore contributing writers and guests NEVER EVER discuss the subject.

If i wrote an article explaining it or presented someone elses article it would be rejected.

I have posted numerous comments in the comment sections which are not removed but are ignored by the website and the vast majority of commenters whio seem to be ignorant of it and no i dont spam comment sections with it as i only post comments on the topic as and when it is appropriate.Its like various comments sections linked to articles are quickly replaced by new articles and they drop off the page never to be looked at again.

I listened to AJ take a call about this and very quickly the call was ended with virtually no acknowledgement from AJ apart from "Yes i was aware that the US is a corporation blah di blah.." then that was that and it was time to swiftly change the subject and onto the next caller.....

How can you rail against the FEDRES and unrepresentative govt and all the rest of it without covering what i am talking about here ???

How can you be pro-Constitutional and protest against unconstitutional legislation and not discuss or promote Lawful rebellion ???

Paul Joseph Watson made one reference to Lawful Rebellion when highlighting a video of a protest in Birkenhead that involved a protest and the arrest of a corrupt judge that was supposedly removed by Youtube and that was it so what about it PJW ???

Did the editorial not notice that little faux pas ???

Phew !!!!! Looks like you got away with it that time !!!!!

Careful how you go in future.........

I am virtually the only commentor who talks of this subject and explains it apart from one other so if nothing else potentially millions view and read the comments so the message must be getting out there.....

I smell a rat here but in the meantime the more this topic is ignored the more glaringly suspicious it looks...

[If PP is controlled opposition then i will describe my points as the silver bullet]

OWS:

I need to articulate my thoughts on OWS or at least some of them.

"Corporations are not people"

Of course they are not but do any of these OWS protestors understand that the UK and the US are corporations and that legislation is contract law/corporate law/contract agreements and that taxation is the corporate revenue stream that they are complaining about and do they recognise that their govt that doesnt represent them are the adminstrators of the US corporate entity ??

Do any of them recognise that they are tied to the UK/US corporation through a contract and that their SS/NI numbers are part of that contract ?

Do any of them understand that if they nullified the contract between themselves and the UK/US corporation then that would be THE most effective form of peaceful protest there is ??

Does the above @Twitterer understand that themselves and all of the other protestors are simply what is known as Chattel that are owned by the US/UK corporate entities through their respective birth certificate registration contracts and SS/NI numbers ??

Doing this would deprive the UK/US corporate entity of its revenue stream and if this was done enmasse then it would be a massive FUCK YOU to the system of Corporate Fascism and the bankers so why arent they all doing it ????

Does Billy Bragg know about this for example ??

I dont know but i mean to find out in the near future........

It seems very clear that the majority of the protestors are politically naive and are misguided and have no understanding of exactly what it is that they are dealing with and how everything works.

Look at that dipshit on @Twitter above.

How can you possibly protest against Wall St and support Barak Obama especially in 2012 ??

Its CORPORATE/FINANCIAL FASCISM STUPID !!!

CORPORATE FASCISM/OBAMA/ROMNEY 2012 !!!!!

I AM GOING TO VOTE TO BE ENSLAVED AGAIN IN 2012 !!!!

DO i have to spell it out for everyone ???

You cannot treat politics like you are a member of a fan club of a personality cult.

Elections are a scam and a deception.

Its not their fault that they are uneductated and naive as they are a product of the education system and my educated guess is the Twitterer/Tweeter is probably aged approx 20 years and to be fair i was clueless when i was that age but not any more as i am self educated.I cant laugh at them on that basis and besides laughing at them will just turn them off so they wont listen.

"tax rich" - tax the rich so Define what is rich ??.

"accountability for Wall St"

I dont disagree with that BUT why no mention of privately owned central banks like the FEDRES ???

Where does the cash come from that you pay for to bail out the too big to fails and foreign banks and god knows what else ???

FFS these kids and the majority of the protestors dont know what they are talking about and they arent changing anything and the @Twitterer above is simply creating the pretext for Obama to propose sweeping superficial regulation and accountability of Wall St so that the majority of protestors who are naive and stupid and uneducated will support Obama on that basis in the next election therefore acheiving absolutely N O T H I N G.

They need to be informed and educated about the entire system especially the private central banking scheme and everything else.

"End Wars"

There is no arguing with that either so these kids are half right but they dont get the bigger picture yet.......



Did you know ??? that the full extent of the debt and liabilities of the US amounts to approx****** 212 trillion USD******* if you factor in all of it which includes collateralised debt obligations and the obligations of US Treasury Bonds ???

You probably dont but you would have heard that the total US debt is approx 15 trillion so let the 212 trillion figure sink in for a bit..........

This figure has been generated under OBama and the respective adminstration so therefore it MAKES NO SENSE to support Obama and it MAKES NO SENSE to support the respective mainstream Republican candidates either as they are all WHORES of the bankers and corporations etc.

Anyway this is just the first stage in the revolution like baby steps and its finding its feet but its not going to just fizzle out although the actual physical protest will fizzle out but the underlying movement against it isnt going to as times will get harder.

How many of you undertand what is known as Odious Debt on the part of govt ??

How many of you know that you are not in any way obliged to be responsible for paying off what is known as Odious Debt ???

The points i make here are what the OWS need to understand and it should be what they are protesting about rather than just Wall ST to the detriment of everything else.

Music i had forgotten about but reminded of again by Youtube:

Arab Strap:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g9Krvl7AEAs

I quite often liked their music as its unique with its stories and kitchen sink dramas that are narrated rather than sung to the music and not only that as far as accents go i have always liked the scottish accent as its one of the best sounding accents as aversed to others that i wont name for the sake of diplomacy with the exception of what is known as Estuary English which is just fucking irritating to listen to and stupid sounding.In the same way that the upwards inflection of student talk where? everything? sounds like a question ? [which is Australian in origin and originated from students watching too many Australian soaps] the Estuary English accent has this irritating downwards inflection which is very irritating to listen to.

Its quite often mothers with children who i hear talking like this where for example children sounds like "Chil- druuuun" and shopping sounds like "Shopp-iiiiiing and so on...

Anyway i digress...............

As for the Cranberries i couldnt stand them or their music and they came out of nowhere and sold millions of albums and then their later albums flopped and they they disappeared so i was very very happy when that happened.

The decline of popular music:

My case in point is Feist who i came across in the form of an ad that appears before a video on Youtube.

Terrible terrible terrible and how i laugh at the Guardian **** review of it but i always laugh at broadsheet music reviews as i think that they are a joke and the reason that Feist got **** is because the reviewer was paid to give Feist ****.

"Metals just sounds fantastic !!"

Fuck Off.Pinky and Perky would sound fantastic***** if the reviewer was paid to say so.

Fucking rubbish.There isnt very much evidence of feistiness going on judging by what i just listened to as she sounds like she cant be bothered or is very tired.Either way its half-assed lame shit.

It really is as simple as that but then again i am baised not only against contemporary music [broadly speaking] but also against broadsheets especially the Guardian which is the neo-liberal corporate Chatham House pseuds corner rag that is politically right on and ok to be seen reading when you are sipping your endless Lattes in a cafe.

Morrissey = Racist ??:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/oct/17/morrissey-takes-racism-battle-court

Late to the party here:

You would not label someone as a paedophile unless you were 100 percent certain that its fact.

You would not label someone as a fraudster unless you were 100 percent certain that its fact

You would not label someone as a rightwing/leftwing/religious extremist unless you were 100 percent certain that its fact

You would not label someone as a plaigarist unless you were 100 percent certain that it is a fact

And so on.....as i have made my point

Free speech isnt free as it costs and here is where you start paying for it.

Free speech that is free is speech that says nothing controversial and which doesnt stray out of accepted norms as there is no payback for that kind of speech.

How many who are aware of this actually study it in detail objectively and draw a conclusion based on that rather than just mindlessly jump to a conclusion which appeals to their own prejudices ??

"Morrissey = Twat"

"Morrissey = Racist"

"Morrissey = Bigot"

and so on.....

It really is just mindless.


Going by what i have read on this topic it does not appear that Morrissey is a racist at all as nothing that i have heard or read from Morrissey explicitely states that he is racist but what you have is a series of comments that are open to interpretation and therefore open to accusations of racism which is typical since so many misunderstand what racism actually means and further to that racism/pc people are just a little bit over-enthusiastic and zelous in their pursuit of equality and fairness and that they choose to look for reasons to slander someone as a racist based on their own prejudices and statements and comments that are ambigious or badly articulated or not thought out properly.

Why Morrissey didnt act rather than just issue threats at the time of the NME article in 2007 i simply dont understand as his decision was always going to store up problems later on.The NME should not have based a front cover article on slander and defamation of character as it was highly irresponsible and that kind of editorial decision should have been based on FACT rather than for the sake of a sensationalist front cover article in the editorial style of a tabloid.It would have been more productive to arrange an interview where it could have been settled that way instead soon after the publication of the article.The NME should not have inferred anything when publishing the interview.

They also knew all about morrisseys reputation for being outspoken and controversial and they took advantage of it when pulishing the interview in the style of a tabloid and that is what is the cause of the problem as the interview had already been edited/amended 3 times before publication which presumes that both parties were happy with the content of the interview but Morrissey had no control over how the interview was presented and what was inferred by the editor of the NME and its design and layout .

I am not aware that there is a time limit on when you can file a lawsuit if its a libel case but i could very easily be wrong but its implied by the NME that the time that has passed since the article was published means that there is no longer a case for libel and the NME imply that there are other motives involved and that there is no longer a case against themselves.This is standard procedure and its no different to how a tabloid would act after consultation with lawyers as the whole point is to avoid action being taken against them and its somewhat cowardly behaviour which attempts to distract from the case in point.Ultimately they do not want to have to payout £££££££££££££££££££££££££ when you cannot automatically assume that £££££££££££££££££££ is the motivating factor in clearing ones own name unless the case against them involves loss of earnings and business etc plus various other factors which does not appear to be the case with Morrissey as it does not appear to have harmed his career in any significant way.I have no idea wether or not Morrissey is seeking a financial settlement or wether its simply about clearing his name but in any case the judge may rule that the NME have to pay compensation in which case Morrissey has no control over that decision and if he isnt seeking cash and gets awarded cash then he may give it to animal rights causes or whatever so who knows........

"...his fans still love him.." - Evans.

Of course his fans still love him so WTF would you expect otherwise ???

Its not just about fans of Morrissey as they are not going to change their minds as they are well known for being loyal as fans of whatever usually are but its about the publics wider perception of you and wether or not their opinion of you has changed as a result of and wether or not that perception has been altered due to an editorial policy and baseless allegations and insinuations etc etc.

Evans[NME] is a dipshit as the comments from Morrissey concerning the Chinese and their treatment of animals which is what Morrissey was talking about when he described them as a "Sub-species" and Morrissey is also irresponsible for saying it when he should have articulated himself a bit better by stating that the Chinese treatment of animals is subhuman or inhumane* for example.Describing them as "sub-species" was shooting himself in the foot.Knowing that Morrissey is passionate about the treatment of animals and vegetarianism and against meat eaters then its seems to be the case that Evans is deliberately misinterpreting what Morrissey meant by a "subspecies" given that Morrisseys opinions and causes are very well publicised its a shame that Evans didnt take this into consideration rather than reacting in a knee-jerk fashion to make her own case stronger.

Evans is the weak link in this case judging by her comments and strawman arguments in this article and if i was a judge i would dismiss them out of hand and i would make a very strong point while doing so.



Morrissey is and always has been a commenter on English culture and an enthusiast of it which is clear from lyrics and videos.It is in no way racist to comment on the decline of English culture if it is a natural evolution of UK culture or if its because of open borders and mass immigration as either way it is a valid criticism and in no way does it imply that one race is superior to another which is the core meaning of racism anyway.The issue concerns racism but it not an exclusively racist issue by any means as its a cultural issue.

How dare you complain about or critique loss of culture and immigration !!!!

How dare you then presume that someone is a racist and do so without an adequate basis !!.

Morrissey complained about multiculturalism in London and while that may or may not be a valid criticism London is and always has been a multicultural city so either accept it or move on although its fair to say that there are plenty of areas of London that are pretty much exclusively/predominantly white.Knightsbridge/Kensington is multicultural as its full of the rich of all nationalities and from my own experience it was and i doubt that it has changed since then.Morrissey commented that while walking along the main street in Knightsbridge he complained that he didnt hear an English accent all the while but there is nothing like a little exaggeration to make your point better.


As for the 1992 example concerning the flag then that again is open to interpretation but wrapping a flag around yourself does not mean that you are a member of the BNP for example.besides that Morrissey has always flirted with imagery and Skinhead culture simply because it is/was part of English culture and The Smiths have always had a skinhead/lad culture following unless i am mistaken*.Morrissey has always been a fan of and celebrated White English Working Class culture and that obviously involves the Union Jack.His own background is White Working Class so why shouldnt he celebrate it ??

Evans also seems critical of Morrisseys right to express himself freely using that as a means to undermine the case against the NME which is sort of a strawman argument to vindicate the NME who instead of simply questioning the comments by Morrissey they chose instead to publish a series of allegations against Morrissey which was irresponsible on their part with no thought given to the consequences of their actions as they were convinced of their own self-righteousness.PC types generally do get carried away with themselves just a little bit and having been the victim of it myself i talk from personal experience although like Morrissey i was somewhat irresponsible and stupid and after the event it was perfectly clear that my comments were misconstrued partly deliberatly and partly because it was not an unfair conclusion to reach having not explained myself properly at the time.

The FACT is if you are accused of racism for whatever reason without an adequate basis for the accusations then those accusations will follow you around unless you do what you have to do to clear your name and make it abundantly clear that you are not a racist then those that may or may not have a grudge against you no longer have a case and have to cease and desist.

*That is an opinion that i agree with 100 percent as in inhumane treatment.

To sum up what i think about this i will say that McNicholas was sloppy and unprofessional for various reasons and there are question marks as to why Morrissey didnt act at the time instead of threatening action and no more.

At some point you have to take responsibility for what you type and say or face the consequences of it and think before typing or speaking.

*I saw The Smiths in 1984 [Meat Is Murder tour] and it was by far the roughest live concerts i have ever been to before and since due to the geezer element present.