This is the reply to the letter posted below :
Perhaps later i will summarise this and explain what it means and its implications.Its all about Company/Corporate law and understanding the difference between that and Common law.They are 2 completely different things.
And no its not just about avoiding paying parking fines etc.You might argue that parking fines as a deterrent are a necessary evil and i am inclined to go along with that to a certain extent but to view this letter as a means of mass non payment of parking fines and nothing much more than that is to miss the point of it completely.
Its not about Anarchy and doing what the fuck you like regardless of the consequence or impact that your actions might have upon others as like i said above i am of the mind that small matters like the law and smaller matters like planning law are necessary evils providing that these institutions are impartial and fair but at the moment they are not .This is part of the problem and its also a large part of the problem that the system is inherently corrupt as you must be aware of by now after bailouts of banks etc and the fact that the Govt dont represent you and only represent their vested interest and the interests of those at the top of the pyramid.
You might not disagree with parking regulations but you might disagree with the overzealousness of parking attendants on performance related pay in which case the letter posted below gives you the ammunition to not pay that unjustly imposed parking fine rather than appealing against it which may or may not get you anywhere.
You may also use this letter as ammunition against Govt legislation if you have been on the receiving end of it or if you are wrongly or unjustly charged by the police or simply dont agree with it.
If you are asked your identity by the police and they ask for your legal title i:E Mr.ALAN SMITH or ask to confirm it dont give it to them or confirm anything. .Refuse to acknowledge or dismiss or disregard this kind of legal terminology and refer to yourself as Peter of the Wolf family or Mark of the McDonald family or whatever your surname/s is .Do not reply to any request of confirmation of title IE : Mr - Miss - Mrs that appears before your name on legally binding documents or forms or anything else when you are confronted by agents of the corporation of the UK.Thisw obviously only applies to govt legislation and does not apply if you sign up for a new credit card etc.However they both use corporate law.If you sign up for a credit card by registering with your full legal title you accept the terms and conditions because you signed up to them and you agreed with them .
The most important and vital point with UK PLC is that you were signed up to and agreed to the conditions of UK PLC by a legal guardian wether or not that was unknowingly or not *without your consent* because you cant very well consent to anything if you were a few days old so someone else acted on your behalf and signed the contract [a registration of birth document] and even with the best intentions or complete ignorance they entered you into a contract without your consent.
This is the basis of extracting yourself from this *legally* binding contract .
If you were a writer would you accept someone else signing you up to a publishing contract with a publisher without your consent ?
If you were a musician in a band looking for a recording contract and found out that someone else had entered you into a recording contract with a record label without your consent even if they had the the best intentions ?
Would you object to this because you did not consent to it ?
I should think that you would so its really no different if you consider what this post is about.Thats providing that you understand what i am saying.
*Every kind of contract no matter what it is has to have your consent.
So therefore someone else cannot give your consent to something unless you consent to it yourself first.you might give consent to someone else to give your consent to sign you up to anything you like if you consent to it first but if you dont then they have no right to act on your behalf and give your consent to anything.
The consent can be yours and has to come from yourself otherwise its not consent.
This is your get out of jail for free card but bear in mind that this only applies to company law and not common law.
Look up what common law is and you will find that it applies to everyone who lives in the UK and there is no escaping it.
Govt legislation is corporate law.If you are charged with an offence look it up and find out if you have breached corporate law or if you have broken the law of the land which is common law.
Its far too long and convoluted to explain all this in a short post and the implications of this are far too wide and far reaching to sum up in a paragraph.
The system is being abused by UK PLC.This is how you fight back if you are on the receiving end of it.
Its not recommended to use this wholesale against any legislation but you can if you like as this letter can be duplicated as it is like a one letter fits all type thing.
Refer the main body of text to the relevant/appropriate authority/corporation that you are dealing with names [if there are any] and departments and case nos or reference numbers etc and dates etc.
Without doing it for you i cant make it any easier for you.
"Chris Lees - Penalty Charge Notice climb down by a Company called South Gloucestershire Council
After Chris was given a Penalty Charge Notice by SGC he sent them this letter below. Below that you will see the letter sent to Chris by SGC saying the matter is now concluded with nothing to pay!
In care of:
(Address removed for publishing)
May 28th, 2009
Re: GS10092187, dated 26/05/09.
Notice of Discharge of Outstanding Fixed Penalty Charge and Request for Clarification.
South Glos Council
Please read the following notice thoroughly and carefully before responding. It is a notice. It informs you. It means what it says.
The reason why you need to read carefully is simple. I am offering conditional agreement. This removes controversy, and means that you no longer have any ultimate recourse to a court of law in this matter, because there is no controversy upon which it could adjudicate. You always have the option of dragging these conditions into a court of law only to be told that they are, indeed, perfectly lawful. That is, of course, always your prerogative should you decide to waste your time.
For this reason it is important that you consider and respond to the offer in substance. The 'nearest official form' will not suffice, and consequently is likely to be ignored by myself without any dishonour on my part.
On the other hand there is a time-limit on the agreement being offered. It is reasonable, and if it runs out then you and all associated parties are in default, removing any and all lawful excuse on your part for proceeding in this matter.
For these reasons it is recommended that you carefully consider this notice and respond in substance, which means actually addressing the points raised herein.
You have apparently made allegations of criminal conduct against me.
You have apparently made demands upon me.
I do not understand those apparent demands and therefore cannot lawfully fulfil them. I seek clarification of your document so that I may act according to the law and maintain my entire body of inalienable Natural Rights.
Failure to accept this offer to clarify and to do so completely and in good faith within 7 (seven) days will be deemed by all parties to mean you and your principal or other parties abandon all demands upon me.
I conditionally accept your offer to agree that I am legal fiction 'person' Mr Christopher Mark Lees and that I owe £70 for services rendered by your company, upon proof of claim of all of the following:
1. Upon proof of claim that I am a person, and not a human being.
2. Upon proof of claim that you know what a 'person' actually is, in legal terms.
3. Upon proof of claim that you know the difference between a 'human being' and a 'person', legally speaking.
4. Upon proof of claim that you know the difference between 'legal' and a 'lawful'.
5. Upon proof of claim that I am legal fiction 'person' Mr Christopher Mark Lees, being the entity to which your paperwork was addressed, and not Christopher: of the Lees family, as commonly called.
6. Upon proof of claim that the charge was the result of a lawful investigation unmarred by prejudice.
7. Upon proof of claim that I am a member of the society whose statutes and subsisting regulations you are enforcing.
8. Upon proof of claim that I showed you some sort of identification.
9 Upon proof of claim that there is a nameable society that I belong to and that the laws covered within any alleged transgressions state that they apply to me within that named society.
Sincerely and without ill will, vexation or frivolity
By: ***_____________________ *** (Agent)
Christopher: of the Lees family
WITHOUT PREJUDICE, i.e. all Natural Inalienable Rights Reserved
Please address all future correspondence in the matter to a direct Human Self, namely Christopher: of the Lees family, as commonly called.
Encl: Original paperwork as received.
This is thier responce!!"
[see top of the post]
Not a lot of people know this.
I was in court once for ABH.The CPS were pressing charges so i called them up and said that i wasnt interested in attending the court .They wrote back saying that i didnt have to attend the court hearing and the case was closed and that was that.I had already not attended one court hearing when i called them.
Never heard another thing from them about it.