Is Gadaffi the new Bin Laden ?

Its very curious that Gadaffi has disappeared but its certainly possible but its certainly possible Gadaffi has already been captured or even killed off or paid off and disappeared while in the meantime Gadaffi is still at large which means a continuation of the war in Libya as its easily possible that the actions of Gadaffi loyalists could be directed by intelligence agencies like the CIA because if Gadaffi is still purported to be free it means the war will continue and if Gadaffi is dead then the supporters of Gadaffi will still oppose the takeover of Libya[but less so as it will reduce morale amongst Gadaffi supporters] so if you think about that it seems obvious that its easier to continue letting Libyans think Gadaffi is not captured or dead as it will fuel resentment towards ALCIADA Libyan rebel forces and the UN and US/NATO which will create a more justifiable pretext to invade and occupy than otherwise as its easier to sell the occupation to the public that way.

There needs to be an enemy to justify the actions of the UN and NATO etc so i am speculating that Gadaffi will be used as another Bin Laden as it will justify huge amounts of resources and expense to track him down when he isnt there just like Bin Laden and because it will justify huge amounts of resources and expense it means more taxpayer $$$$$$$$$$$$$$ will be allocated to the capture of Gadaffi.

Globalist CFR President Richard Haas confirms that my thoughts on Libya were correct:

"http://www.prisonplanet.com/globalist-richard-haas-calls-for-nato-occupation-of-libya.html"

That is as straight from the horses mouth as it will ever get.

Also Tony Cartalucci is an outstanding commentator which is of course a recommendation.

Above is a photo of Gibril Elqarfally who is the head of the LibyaNWO NationaNWO TransitioNWO Council.If its alright i would rather have Gadaffi than this dead eyed ugly Globalist shill scumbag any day.What a creep.In any case its now perfectly clear that the vision of the new Libya is not one that has been envisioned by Libyans themselves hence the presence of Globalists like Gibbering Gerbil Elqawfully as the so called revolution comes with a predetermined political outlook and outcome thanks to the likes of the CFR.Housetrain the Libyans into being service sector servants which again is proof that Libya is intended to be sabotaged as it has already been demonstrated here in the West that service sector economies by themselves are designed to fail as strong economies have a healthy manufacturing base as amply demonstrated by China and previously the US and the UK at one point in time so its clear that Libya will be steered deliberately in the wrong direction by the NWO from what was previously a very strong economy that was debt free into a country that is indebted to foreign banks via the IMF.

What about the 144 tons of gold ?

What about it indeed but you wont be hearing very much about the gold as it will be stolen if it hasnt been hidden by Gadaffi and its all well and good thinking that it should be returned to the people of Libya as its theirs but that isnt going to be how it happens as if its recovered by NATO forces then it will be misappropriated and it will be used to increase the gold liquidity of the previously mentioned foreign banks and their subsideries as there is a shortage of physical gold and the foreign offshore bankers are finding this to be a problem as they have massively exaggerated their paper gold bonds[gilts] so that the gilts cannot be exchanged for physical gold and in any case war and occupations mean looting so its nothing new.

Chinese huge glowing white bubble o0ver shanghai:

http://shanghaiist.com/2011/08/23/ufo_shanghai.php?gallery0Pic=2#gallery

This looks to be related to the alleged earthquake lights in Japan and the Norway spiral.

Cowardice :

What is the definition of a coward ?

Someone who attempted[as in failed] to get me banned from a forum behind my back.

It seems like my intuition was right because i knew that something was going on behind my back concerning particular individuals as it was obvious.

I have NO respect for anyone who cant be upfront about things but the individual in question who called for the ban didnt act out of character.Why anyone thinks that i would ever return to that place after all that has happened is deluded as it would be like volunteering to be abused on a regular basis and its curious that some lamented my leaving while being completly silent when the abuse was going on not that i wanted or needed their support as i can take care of myself but its still curious.......Half a dozen or so expressed that they were sad about it and i am expected to go running back ?

I dont think so.People come and go in life so they should get on with it and forget about it as i prefer life in the wilderness and to go where i am appreciated.

There are others who have a very different idea about what is and isnt reasonable.Perhaps then since this is the case then we really should not be talking to each other anymore.A week or so afterwards there was that unpleasent business in Norway which served to demonstrate that i was entirely justified in my objections to be labelled and smeared as a such and such.You know what i am talking about.I was disappointed by that comment.


I visited that site a short while ago for the first time since leaving and have no wish to return to it.

I left that site for 3 months as a trial and then reurned once again but while being absent from it i made a deal with myself that if there was any more juvenile bitching and squabbling then i would leave permanently as i just found it all to be very negative and draining and stressful and to keep repeating the process would be like doing something stupid over and over again and not learning from it.

People are very very odd.

"90 percent of what i typed was drivel" or words to that effect ?

If you are talking politics/truth in particular amongst what else i typed which did include drivel then its completely ignorant as its all verifiable but i do understand the constraints of peer pressure upon individuals who care too much about what others think in life.Personally i dont believe that statement was true as i rate your intelligence levels to be much higher than that as apart from anything else you are intelligent enough to show interest in the subject and for that and many other reasons i do have a considerable amount of respect for you.


If you are reading this and dont know what i am talking about then thats because you do not need to know.

[I had to type all this just to get it out rather than carrying it around as baggage and its mostly negative as that is what needed to be addressed but the positives exist as well.]

NATO/ALCIADA hypocrisy :

NATO are concerned that ALCIADA in Libya that they are funding and arming to overthrow Gadaffi will smuggle arms out of Libya when its obviously alright to import arms into Libya so they want the borders of Libya secured to keep arms from leaving Libya when commonsense dictates that arming them and employing them in the first place is highly irresponsible unless its yet another problem-reaction-solution which is certain.They arm them and now they are concerned about it ??

It really makes sense to destabilise a previously stable country and to instigate a civil war that could last for years.Its also very curious how there has never been any mention in the MSM about legitimate protestors and campaigners for political change in Libya as its ALL about "Libyan rebel forces form Bhengazi" as if to suggest that they reflect the wishes of the entire Libyan population and also the so called Libyan rebel forces have never made it clear what they themselves have in mind for Libya as they are mostly politically illiterate imported goat herders from Iraq and Afghanistan etc who have the LibyaNWO NatioNWO TransitionaNWO Council to speak for them who have been selected by the CFR etc etc and from what i have seen from them i do not like what i see and hear.

It really makes sense to allow the Jihadist "Libyan rebel forces" to impose Shariah law on Libya which is NOT the way to create a free and open society.The reason for stating this is that the draft of the new Libyan constitution appears to allow the imposition of Shariah law which ism incompatiable with Democracy and at this point it is unknown what the consensus of Libyans is regarding Shariah law as it appears to be something that is connected to the Jihadist ALCIADA rebel forces who despite apparently hating the West dont seem to object to being armed and funded by the West and the West does not seem to mind funding and arming the same organisation and even individuals who have been killing US/UK military personel in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Stealing the Libyan resources and preparing the ground[via globalisation] to be fully exploited by Fortune 500 companies and destroying their infrastructure and loaning Libya cash to rebuild and privatising their bankling system and preventing the water irrigation project to direct water to the rest of Africa and instigating civil unrest/disorder/war and so on sure sounds like a plan.

This is too sick for words right now.

Stupid fuckers but its exactly what i expect from NATO filth like that freakish female [i think ?] spokeswoman for NATO on Newsnight the other night that was featuring the staged rebel seizure of Tripoli and the alleged end of Gadaffi.

Can William Hague,David CaMoron,Obama,the UN/NATO/US or anyone at all please explain how ariel bombing a city for days and days on end with no respite is not creating a humanitarian disaster and if Tripoli was alleged to be under the control of victorious rebel forces then why is it still being bombed ?

I can answer that last question and its because rebel forces have not taken Tripoli as they were set up and have walked into a trap that they cant get out of and the same goes for other areas of Libya and it was designed to fail to create the pretext for a foreign stabilisation force to enter Libya which is most probably only a couple of weeks away if that....

Positive money :

http://www.positivemoney.org.uk/2011/07/our-proposals-left-wing-or-right-wing/



I need to get my brain in gear before commenting on this any further but there is NOT ONE solid argument for fractional reserve lending apart from arguing that the banking system has been running on fractional reserve lending for so long now that everyone is effectively locked into it and it has created a bubble and getting rid of it is going to result in some very serious redress for the economy.[unless you count greed as a solid argument for it]


"Jesus Huerta de Soto is today’s leading Austrian school economist, who in his book “Money, Bank Credit and Economic Cycles” published a proposal of a reform of banking system. He suggests a transition from the most controlled systems (those with central planning in the banking and financial sector) to the least controlled ones (those in which the central bank has been abolished and complete freedom prevails) which consists of 5 stages."

As an example there were over 300 privately/independently owned commercial clearing/lending banks before the Wall St crash which cleared them out and put them out of business as then like now its all about getting rid of the competition so thst there is no free market in banking and lending as what you have now is a multitude of different clearing banks that are owned and controlled by the very same banking oligarchs who are looting from you and sabotaging the various economies in the West and elsewhere.

Also there are calls to return to the Gold Standard.The problem is not that there is not enough gold to cover all of the cash in circulation as that isnt a problem as a ratio of gold to the inflated/deflated cash in circulation could be worked out[but it would vastly deflate the value of cash per Oz of gold] but its who owns all of the gold that is the problem.The majority of gold reserves have been systematically looted from the UK and the US and elsewhere by Rothschilds etc also known as the Inter-Alpha group or the Anglo-Dutch banking cartel-call them what you like so there is no publically held gold reserves in which to back the respective currencies so the stolen gold needs to re-patriated/recovered before the gold standard is re-introduced and any calls for gold standard to be reintroduced from official sources who are affiliated to the Anglo-Dutch banking cartel should be treated with suspicion as the banking oligarchs will try to use this tactic as a get out of jail free card and in doing so nothing would change as you would still have criminals running the banking system.

"Let’s start from the right – the Austrian school of economics, which is associated with libertarian political perspectives. They argue for an extremely limited role for government and the smallest possible amount of government intervention in the economy."

Its no surprise that the banking oligarchs advocated the Austrian school that was fronted by Libertarian perspectives as the only free market that the banking oligarchs support is one which they control.This is self explanatory but if you wanted to establish your own clearing bank you would not find that this is possible as in the fake free market as competition is a sin.So they argue FOR a free market that is in reality non-existant.

You could argue that its the lack of regulation that has caused the collapse of the western economies but it is not an argument against lack of regulation per se as it was all deliberately designed to fail so if the banking oligarchs were removed from the equation then you could argue that lack of regulation would be a positive thing but again a complete lack of regulation within the banking sector would not be positive thing because with complete freedom the banking system would be up to its usual tricks so one scenario becomes virtually indistinguishable from the other.However the creation of a genuine free market within the banking sector would create banks that would be favorable to account holders so those banks would naturally generate more business than those that are less favorable which is the nature of a free market as it means choice but i think that a complete lack of regulation is a naive idea as regulation is in theory meant to protect you and if there is no regulation then banks will be doing what they are doing now as they were allowed to generate 10 times the amount of lending through fractional reserve lending.

If lending is based on 100 percent reserves then its likely that borrowing terms will be much more stringent than they are now with higher rates of interest to compensate for their loss of leverage.



I have started writing this just after getting up and its way too early in the morning for this kind of shit so i will have to stop typing for now.

However the article doesnt differentiate between commercial clearing banks and the activities of privately owned central banks whose paper currency is printed out of nothing with no leverage required wheras commercial clearing banks have leverage of approx 8-10 times its cash deposit so theoretically $100 becomes $1000.There has to be a fairer and more ethical way for banks to generate credit for borrowers because at present they offer you virtually NO interest on savings yet charge extortionate amounts of interest on mortgages for example so if the interest that you are charged reflected the fact that they create credit out of nothing then it would be more acceptable and ethical.To add insult to injury banks and the FEDRES are proposing negative interest rates for holders of accounts within commercial clearing banks which means you pay the bank to hold your cash.

All of this is pointless unless the criminal element who own and control the banking system are removed from the equation.

Presently banks in the US are being paid not to lend out cash as they make more money by keeping the reserves that were paid for by taxpayers* as they are paid interest on their reserves.

Article:

http://www.businessinsider.com/government-paying-banks-not-to-lend-2011-8#ixzz1VmJgL37F

A quote from the article :

"We don't think GOP presidential candidate Rick Perry should have threatened to kill Ben Bernanke the other day, but we can certainly understand his frustration."

I wouldnt concern yourself too much over that comment as Rick Perry is yet another sellout/bought and paid for sellout NWO/Corporate/banking duplicitious WHORE [just like Obama] who is only saying that to throw you a bone trying to sound like Ron Paul so any frustrations voiced by Rick Perry should not be taken seriously.Perry describes the activities of the FED as "almost treasonous" so which part of treasonous doesnt Rick Perry understand as its completely treasonous and given the fact that Rick Perry is a traitor [therefore treasonous] its surprising that Rick Perry has a problem misunderstanding what is defined as treason*.

Rick Perry is a subject for another day.

This ends.


*However since the FEDRES is NOT a govt institution then its debateable that they can be described as treasonous as they are a private company posing as a federal agency so they could likely get out of the situation on that technicality despite the fact that they claim to be acting on behalf of the US govt.Its those in political office who are allowing the existence of the FEDRES on behalf of the banking oligarchs who are the traitors.


[I dont understand why anyone would want to listen to the Grateful Dead]

*Too big to fails are the biggest ever welfare recipitents in history.

annoying problem:

This watch was a gift from a few years ago and the locking mechanism on the bracelet has failed even though it was alright the other day and today i very nearly lost it.I cannot find any record of this watch online as its a few years old now and YSL dont make watches anymore as far as i can tell and i cannot find an agent of YSL who can fix it so its a problem and it may be unrepairable as parts are probably not available anymore.Hopefully Watches Of Switzerland can help..........