China – 73,237,000[possibly as high as 85 million]
Union of Soviet Socialist Republics – 58,627,000
Russian Federated Socialist Republic – 3,163,000
Democratic People’s Republic of Korea – 3,163,000
Cambodia – 2,627,000
Democratic Republic of Afghanistan – 1.175,000
Vietnam – 1.670,000
People’s Democratic Republic of Ethiopea – 1,343,610
Socialist Federal Republic of yugoslavia – 1,072,000
Chinese Soviet Republic – 700,000
People’s Republic of Mozambique – 700,000
Socialist Republic of Romania – 435,000
People’s republic of Bulgaria – 435,000
People’s Republic of Angola – 125,000
Mongolian People’s Republic – 100,000
People’s Socialist Republic of Albania – 100,000
Republic of Cuba – 73,000
German Democratic Republic – 70,000
Socialist Republic of Czechoslovakia – 65,000
Lao People’s Republic – 56,000
Hungarian Peopl’s Republic – 27,000
People’s Republic of Poland – 22,000
People’s Republic or Yemen – 1,000
Top of the list is China.
This proves that the West/the UN etc etc have no problem at all in supporting and praising and celebrating t h e most vile and inhuman and abhorrent mass murdering political regime on the planet while at the same time condemning other regimes for vilolating human rights.The fact that the UN support China is not in the least bit surprising and they were involved in the well publicised 60 years of Maoism celebrations and by well publicised i mean Times Sq in New York which was devoted to it.
Further to that the China death toll will be even higher than that when you consider that that is a known figure but take into consideration Chinas one child policy where female babies are thrown out in the trash or buried in holes or used to make soup.There wont be any official figures for that since the female babies dont officially exist and then add to that all the babies that are physically defective in whatever way.Very very conservatively you could double the 85 million figure which is still low considering the size of the population.There are a lot of other causes of death in China that i havent even gone into.I would be very surprised if China publish accurate figures regarding how many die each year due to its political regime.
Another interesting aspect of that list is that with the exception of the Yemen and Mozambique they are all Collectivist regimes so the list proves that Collectivist/Socialist/Communist regimes have the worst record of mass murder in modern history.
Its just as distasteful as seeing ignorant morons wearing Che Guevera T shirts.
Saturday, 23 July 2011
Thursday, 21 July 2011
Cameron/Murdoch murder mystery :
The journalist who was suicided as it were is a very curious thing.It seems like there is an effort by the establishment to get rid of Murdoch for reasons unknown as if there wasnt the Guardian wouldnt have covered it and none of what has happened so far would have happened in the first place but it seems like the trail of criminality was going to be too compromising for those within the establishment.The damage has been done to Murdoch which was the plan but suiciding the star witness meant the trail couldnt lead to the top and incriminate those concerned at top level as i think they realised that it was going to go too far otherwise.I doubt very much that the journalist was suicided/offed to protect Cameron as he isnt that important.
This whole situation will be used to blackmail Cameron to do whatever the establishment want but at the same time Cameron was going along with it all anyway but it might be used to blackmail Cameron into fully supporting an invasion/occupation of Libya.I dont see this as an effort to frame Cameron and get rid if him and it will only sink Cameron if the establishment want it to and i dont see any reason for doing so other than dealings with the private sector to privatise the BBC and to end licence fee paying that i mention below which may have been a step too far on the part of Cameron but this was all known about anyway and if this was a problem to the establishment then i dont see this mess as the best way to go about it but i do see it as a way of getting rid of Murdoch who is in decline anyway and if you want to get rid of a media baron then you have to have good reason to do so.
You would have thought by now that Murdoch and others implicated would have been arrested by now but it hasnt happened yet so if Murdoch etc havent been charged then it does seem like this is some kind of media circus but having said that the UK govt and intelligence agencies routinely wiretap as its nothing new and as Murdoch is CFR etc then that means he is untouchable to a certain extent.Rebecca Brooks and others who have been arrested are also expendable but if Rebecca Brooks has been arrested then she will know about the involvement of the UK police but will she spill the beans or wont she and to what extent ??
She will assist the police with their inquiries but my guess is she wont incriminate anyone too important as this is an instance of the UK police investigating themselves and the police will protect their own just like they always do.The police will either influence Rebecca Brooks or the charges will be dropped or there will be some kind of damage limitation exercise on the part of the UK police.
This has further damaged the reputation of the UK govt but they must have known this would happen all along.
Also what is curious is that the UK police are implicated heavily but at the same time the UK police are covering up the establishment murder/suspicious death of Sean Hoare [ordered to from top level]so what did Sean Hoare know that others who have since resigned from the MET and Scotland Yard who were expendable dont know ? Or was it simply the fact that Sean Hoare blew the whistle in the first place and that killing him was meant to send out a very strong message to others who also knew too much?
Anyone implicated in this will have been talked to and will not sing like a canary especially if they have families. Its possible that Sean Hoare has been abducted by the establishment and the death of Sean Hoare would provide cover for this but Sean Hoare has relatives and they will have to be able to confirm his death and deal with it so that does rule out an abduction to a very large extent.
Its very odd that the statement from the UK police over the death of Sean Hoare was unexplained but not suspicious when you would think that an unexplained death would not rule out suspicious circumstances.This makes it look even more suspicious than it does already.Its an idiotic statement on the part of the police as if to suggest that someone who knew what Sean Hoare knew about widescale corruption and a wiretapping ring found dead in their home is not suspicious.Absurd nonsense and a blatant lie and cover up.Sean Hoare had alcohol and substance abuse problems which will be used as the cause of death.This is a lot easier and convenient than the death of Dr.Kelly who didnt bleed out after allegedly slashing his wrists will sitting under a tree.
The Daily Mail ran a hit piece on Sean Hoare and the death of and it attempted to cover up any suspicious circumstances which in itself is suspicious when you would think that the Daily Mail would have been more enquiring over it but perhaps its because its protecting Cameron but their reaction would have been completely the opposite if Labour were still in power.
It does make sense to me that whistleblowers should in future go about their business anonymously or go into hiding somewhere as you are simply too vulnerable and if this guy had reason to fear for his life then why would you hide in your own house ? You couldnt ask for police protection for obvious reasons as you would disappear or again be suicided/die under mysterious circumstances.
If the UK govt was in with Murdoch which they are then i dont get the motive behind exposing Murdoch as its just more govt/corporation corruption and the only motive i can think of is Murdoch threatening the BBC and with Conservatives wanting to get rid of the BBC being funded by taxpayers so this situation was only ever allowed to go so far as the UK establishment were not going to let go of their cash cow and political propaganda machine that is the BBC which is the UK version of PRAVDA.
Very curious indeed but sooner rather than later i expect that the MSM will focus on something else to distract everyone from it.
This whole situation will be used to blackmail Cameron to do whatever the establishment want but at the same time Cameron was going along with it all anyway but it might be used to blackmail Cameron into fully supporting an invasion/occupation of Libya.I dont see this as an effort to frame Cameron and get rid if him and it will only sink Cameron if the establishment want it to and i dont see any reason for doing so other than dealings with the private sector to privatise the BBC and to end licence fee paying that i mention below which may have been a step too far on the part of Cameron but this was all known about anyway and if this was a problem to the establishment then i dont see this mess as the best way to go about it but i do see it as a way of getting rid of Murdoch who is in decline anyway and if you want to get rid of a media baron then you have to have good reason to do so.
You would have thought by now that Murdoch and others implicated would have been arrested by now but it hasnt happened yet so if Murdoch etc havent been charged then it does seem like this is some kind of media circus but having said that the UK govt and intelligence agencies routinely wiretap as its nothing new and as Murdoch is CFR etc then that means he is untouchable to a certain extent.Rebecca Brooks and others who have been arrested are also expendable but if Rebecca Brooks has been arrested then she will know about the involvement of the UK police but will she spill the beans or wont she and to what extent ??
She will assist the police with their inquiries but my guess is she wont incriminate anyone too important as this is an instance of the UK police investigating themselves and the police will protect their own just like they always do.The police will either influence Rebecca Brooks or the charges will be dropped or there will be some kind of damage limitation exercise on the part of the UK police.
This has further damaged the reputation of the UK govt but they must have known this would happen all along.
Also what is curious is that the UK police are implicated heavily but at the same time the UK police are covering up the establishment murder/suspicious death of Sean Hoare [ordered to from top level]so what did Sean Hoare know that others who have since resigned from the MET and Scotland Yard who were expendable dont know ? Or was it simply the fact that Sean Hoare blew the whistle in the first place and that killing him was meant to send out a very strong message to others who also knew too much?
Anyone implicated in this will have been talked to and will not sing like a canary especially if they have families. Its possible that Sean Hoare has been abducted by the establishment and the death of Sean Hoare would provide cover for this but Sean Hoare has relatives and they will have to be able to confirm his death and deal with it so that does rule out an abduction to a very large extent.
Its very odd that the statement from the UK police over the death of Sean Hoare was unexplained but not suspicious when you would think that an unexplained death would not rule out suspicious circumstances.This makes it look even more suspicious than it does already.Its an idiotic statement on the part of the police as if to suggest that someone who knew what Sean Hoare knew about widescale corruption and a wiretapping ring found dead in their home is not suspicious.Absurd nonsense and a blatant lie and cover up.Sean Hoare had alcohol and substance abuse problems which will be used as the cause of death.This is a lot easier and convenient than the death of Dr.Kelly who didnt bleed out after allegedly slashing his wrists will sitting under a tree.
The Daily Mail ran a hit piece on Sean Hoare and the death of and it attempted to cover up any suspicious circumstances which in itself is suspicious when you would think that the Daily Mail would have been more enquiring over it but perhaps its because its protecting Cameron but their reaction would have been completely the opposite if Labour were still in power.
It does make sense to me that whistleblowers should in future go about their business anonymously or go into hiding somewhere as you are simply too vulnerable and if this guy had reason to fear for his life then why would you hide in your own house ? You couldnt ask for police protection for obvious reasons as you would disappear or again be suicided/die under mysterious circumstances.
If the UK govt was in with Murdoch which they are then i dont get the motive behind exposing Murdoch as its just more govt/corporation corruption and the only motive i can think of is Murdoch threatening the BBC and with Conservatives wanting to get rid of the BBC being funded by taxpayers so this situation was only ever allowed to go so far as the UK establishment were not going to let go of their cash cow and political propaganda machine that is the BBC which is the UK version of PRAVDA.
Very curious indeed but sooner rather than later i expect that the MSM will focus on something else to distract everyone from it.
Sunday, 17 July 2011
Libyan Western backed rebel forces/Ethnic cleansing:
http://www.google.co.uk/search?client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&channel=s&hl=en&source=hp&biw=1041&bih=568&q=libyan+rebel+forces+ethnic+cleansing&btnG=Google+Search
I dont have the time or the inclination right now to write a long article about this but if this is what the West are backing as part of their takeover of Libya then it is completely and utterly reprehensible and sickening not to mention their ALQuaeda/ALCIADA connections and again supporting them and giving them credence as legitimate revolutionaries is again completely reprehensible and sickening as they have no legitimacy either as revolutionaries or as being representative of the people of Libya.They have now been formally recognised by the US or agents posing as US politicians like Hilary Rodham Clinton who is posing as the US Secretary Of State despite the fact that they are unfit to govern a country and they have no experience of governing a country.
I am also very curious just how many of the ALCIADA rebel forces are actually Libyans as they are well known for importing thugs from wherever they can to assist their cause as the exact same thing happened in Iraq and elsewhere so its my belief that this was not a homegrown revolution but rather something that was partly fermented and initiated by the West and its a well known fact that Western agents of intelligence agencies and US/UK special forces are active in Libya and have been for decades and i know this from an official source.This whole thing started very suddenly and it originated in Bhengazi and it was timed to coincide with the Arab Spring which was meant to provide it with cover to make it look like a legitimate revolution/an offshoot of the Arab Spring which it is not*.The US/NATO on record admit that they are funding and arming them and the US/NATO have a habit of admitting something well after the event and the act of admitting it is meant to give such actions legitimacy and to normalise it.
Apart from ethnic cleansing that is documented there is the problem of looting,raping,various acts of brutality and mutilations,destruction of private property,child soldiers amongst the rebel forces,the use of landmines amongst other examples i havent listed.No doubt that the scum rebel forces are not documenting their use of landmines and keeping a record of where they have deployed landmines which creates a hazard for anyone unfortunate enough to walk into an area where landmines have been deployed.No idea as of yet where they are sourcing landmines from or who manufactured them.
It is my belief that backing the aforementioned rebel forces is done with the intention of stirring up tribalism and ethnic cleansing etc which will create the pretext that justifies a permanent US/NATO occupation of Libya.
This is the age old problem of revolutions and that being what is the result of a successful revolution is often worse than what went before it and this is even more likely in a culture that is tribal and even more so in a culture whose tribalism is based on ethnicity/religious beliefs and affiliations.
*Thats not to suggest that there are not legitimate revolutionaries/pro-democracy movements in Libya.
I dont have the time or the inclination right now to write a long article about this but if this is what the West are backing as part of their takeover of Libya then it is completely and utterly reprehensible and sickening not to mention their ALQuaeda/ALCIADA connections and again supporting them and giving them credence as legitimate revolutionaries is again completely reprehensible and sickening as they have no legitimacy either as revolutionaries or as being representative of the people of Libya.They have now been formally recognised by the US or agents posing as US politicians like Hilary Rodham Clinton who is posing as the US Secretary Of State despite the fact that they are unfit to govern a country and they have no experience of governing a country.
I am also very curious just how many of the ALCIADA rebel forces are actually Libyans as they are well known for importing thugs from wherever they can to assist their cause as the exact same thing happened in Iraq and elsewhere so its my belief that this was not a homegrown revolution but rather something that was partly fermented and initiated by the West and its a well known fact that Western agents of intelligence agencies and US/UK special forces are active in Libya and have been for decades and i know this from an official source.This whole thing started very suddenly and it originated in Bhengazi and it was timed to coincide with the Arab Spring which was meant to provide it with cover to make it look like a legitimate revolution/an offshoot of the Arab Spring which it is not*.The US/NATO on record admit that they are funding and arming them and the US/NATO have a habit of admitting something well after the event and the act of admitting it is meant to give such actions legitimacy and to normalise it.
Apart from ethnic cleansing that is documented there is the problem of looting,raping,various acts of brutality and mutilations,destruction of private property,child soldiers amongst the rebel forces,the use of landmines amongst other examples i havent listed.No doubt that the scum rebel forces are not documenting their use of landmines and keeping a record of where they have deployed landmines which creates a hazard for anyone unfortunate enough to walk into an area where landmines have been deployed.No idea as of yet where they are sourcing landmines from or who manufactured them.
It is my belief that backing the aforementioned rebel forces is done with the intention of stirring up tribalism and ethnic cleansing etc which will create the pretext that justifies a permanent US/NATO occupation of Libya.
This is the age old problem of revolutions and that being what is the result of a successful revolution is often worse than what went before it and this is even more likely in a culture that is tribal and even more so in a culture whose tribalism is based on ethnicity/religious beliefs and affiliations.
*Thats not to suggest that there are not legitimate revolutionaries/pro-democracy movements in Libya.
Friday, 15 July 2011
Fringe world:
I am living in a fringe world and so are you.
Heres a simple breakdown of Fringe World economics:
OMG OMG !! IF we dont raise the debt ceiling then the sky will turn upside down and planet Earth will implode and collapse in on itself so GIVE US MORE CASH and it will all be reversed ! so you give them more cash that you pay for but thats not enough so GIVE US MORE CASH or planet Earth and the entire monetary system will implode and the sky will collapse and the universe will potentially collapse and the results will be CATASTROPHIC !! but if you give us more cash then we can fix it all so you give them more cash but its not enough to avert the disaster and there will be dire consequences that will last far longer and will impact far harder than anything that has ever existed in the history of the universe if we are not bailed out so GIVE US MORE CASH !! so we give them yet more cash to stabilise the economy but its not enough as the short and long term recovery is much worse than we previously thought so unless you want to suffer the consequences that will be so far reaching that you could travel to the end of the universe and beyond we had better have another round of quantative easing OR ELSE THE SKY WILL COLLAPSE !!! so we give them even more cash but the recovery has gone into an irreversible decline that is much worse than expected SO GIVE US MORE CASH to reverse the irreversible economic collapse but its not enough and on and on it goes...........
Beam me up Scotty.
The only bailouts that i endorse would be bailing them all out from an aircraft flying at a high altitude without a parachute.
That was a slightly exaggerated version of what is going on at present and if you didnt realise that its all deliberate then you would think that Chimps are running the economic system but the truth is you are all being looted and scammed.
No jobs - no manufacturing base = mass unemployment which means less tax revenue which means more borrowing which means more debt which means more interest payments which means more debt which means more borrowing which means more debt which means more interest payments which means an even even bigger deficit and thats another million jobs transferred overseas which means less tax revenue which means more borrowing which means more interest payments which means more debt which means an even bigger defecit which means more debt which means more borrowing and on and on it goes.......
Heres a simple breakdown of Fringe World economics:
OMG OMG !! IF we dont raise the debt ceiling then the sky will turn upside down and planet Earth will implode and collapse in on itself so GIVE US MORE CASH and it will all be reversed ! so you give them more cash that you pay for but thats not enough so GIVE US MORE CASH or planet Earth and the entire monetary system will implode and the sky will collapse and the universe will potentially collapse and the results will be CATASTROPHIC !! but if you give us more cash then we can fix it all so you give them more cash but its not enough to avert the disaster and there will be dire consequences that will last far longer and will impact far harder than anything that has ever existed in the history of the universe if we are not bailed out so GIVE US MORE CASH !! so we give them yet more cash to stabilise the economy but its not enough as the short and long term recovery is much worse than we previously thought so unless you want to suffer the consequences that will be so far reaching that you could travel to the end of the universe and beyond we had better have another round of quantative easing OR ELSE THE SKY WILL COLLAPSE !!! so we give them even more cash but the recovery has gone into an irreversible decline that is much worse than expected SO GIVE US MORE CASH to reverse the irreversible economic collapse but its not enough and on and on it goes...........
Beam me up Scotty.
The only bailouts that i endorse would be bailing them all out from an aircraft flying at a high altitude without a parachute.
That was a slightly exaggerated version of what is going on at present and if you didnt realise that its all deliberate then you would think that Chimps are running the economic system but the truth is you are all being looted and scammed.
No jobs - no manufacturing base = mass unemployment which means less tax revenue which means more borrowing which means more debt which means more interest payments which means more debt which means more borrowing which means more debt which means more interest payments which means an even even bigger deficit and thats another million jobs transferred overseas which means less tax revenue which means more borrowing which means more interest payments which means more debt which means an even bigger defecit which means more debt which means more borrowing and on and on it goes.......
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
